By Shashank Jejurikar ’13, A&E Editor

“House of Cards” is a stirring political series packed with intrigue, drama, and expert storytelling. The first season employs great writing, better acting, and innovative cinematography to show us the trials and triumphs of Democratic Congressman Frank Underwood. Despite the season’s occasional missteps and inconsistencies, “House of Cards” will draw you into this world of power and politics.

The hallmark of “House of Cards” is its acting; led by Kevin Spacey, who plays Frank Underwood, the cast brings the show’s unique and distinct characters to life. Though his southern accent can be off-putting, Kevin Spacey embodies the lead character brilliantly; he is a psychopathic, power-hungry, and politically skilled protagonist. Throughout Underwood’s quest for revenge, we are given periodic glimpses into his psyche and thought-process. During important conversations, Spacey’s character abruptly turns to the camera and addresses the audience, explaining the reasons behind his deceptions and political maneuvering.

The driving force behind the season’s intensity is its dynamic storyline. The plot revolves around Congressman Underwood’s quest for revenge after being denied a high cabinet position by the president he helped put into power. Along the way, a variety of interesting characters and side-plots emerge to complement the main story arc. Most notable of these secondary players is Underwood’s wife, Claire. Influential in her own right, she works as both friend and foe to her husband’s career, creating a complex relationship that becomes an integral part of the show. Time and time again, Claire’s drive and ambition lend her a psychopathy rivaling that of her husband’s. If nothing, they truly believe that the end justifies the means. In sharp contrast to Underwood’s breed of politician is Congressman Peter Russo. Russo is an incredibly complex and conflicted character. In spite of his many flaws – most notably drug addiction – Russo quickly emerges as the show’s sole likeable character. This core cast – complemented by a host of equally interesting peripheral characters – is engaged in perpetual conflict. The “House of Cards” writers spin an intense and dynamic political tale. My only gripe with this tale is that the writers sometimes forego realism for added drama – many of the plot twists and scenes are hard to believe. However, the show does a good enough job of grabbing your attention that these fantastical elements are not much of a problem.

While the writing and acting are at the heart of the series, “House of Cards” would not be nearly as powerful without its cinematography. The mood throughout the season is dark and tense,

and the camera angles intensify the moment and properly depict the emotion of the characters.

All in all, “House of Cards” is a revolutionary and engaging political drama. The

characters are intriguing, the plot unpredictable, and the acting exemplary. I recommend it to any fan of politics, or for that matter, any form of TV drama.

Image courtesy of www.konbini.com